![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
uk.tech.digital-tv (Digital TV - General) (uk.tech.digital-tv) Discussion of all matters technical in origin related to the reception of digital television transmissions, be they via satellite, terrestrial or cable. Advertising is forbidden, with no exceptions. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wednesday BBC2
The camera view could only incorporate 3 members of each team at one time, the fourth person was out of shot. Strange |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, Programme is on BBC4 @19:30 dated 2016
"Phi" wrote in message news ![]() Wednesday BBC2 The camera view could only incorporate 3 members of each team at one time, the fourth person was out of shot. Strange |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 15 December 2017 20:10:39 UTC, Phi wrote:
The camera view could only incorporate 3 members of each team at one time, the fourth person was out of shot. Cameraman error, or the effect of increasing obesity even in university students? Owain |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe the studio was too small or the wide angle lenses introduced too much
distortion. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Phi" wrote in message news ![]() Wednesday BBC2 The camera view could only incorporate 3 members of each team at one time, the fourth person was out of shot. Strange |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/12/2017 08:01, Brian Gaff wrote:
Maybe the studio was too small or the wide angle lenses introduced too much distortion. Brian I would suggest setting the aspect ratio on the TV back to 16:9. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/12/2017 09:10, Norman Wells wrote:
On 16/12/2017 08:01, Brian Gaff wrote: Maybe the studio was too small or the wide angle lenses introduced too much distortion. Â* Brian I would suggest setting the aspect ratio on the TV back to 16:9. You wouldn't lose the sides by setting it to 4:3. All you'd do is make the students look thin. Bill |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did anyone suggest it was not then? I thought the bad aspect ratio should be
rather obvious if wrong. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Norman Wells" wrote in message ... On 16/12/2017 08:01, Brian Gaff wrote: Maybe the studio was too small or the wide angle lenses introduced too much distortion. Brian I would suggest setting the aspect ratio on the TV back to 16:9. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Wright" wrote in message news ![]() On 16/12/2017 09:10, Norman Wells wrote: On 16/12/2017 08:01, Brian Gaff wrote: Maybe the studio was too small or the wide angle lenses introduced too much distortion. Brian I would suggest setting the aspect ratio on the TV back to 16:9. You wouldn't lose the sides by setting it to 4:3. All you'd do is make the students look thin. Bill You would if you'd selected 4:3 'pan & scan' rather than 'letterbox'. -- Dave W |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave W" wrote in message news ![]() "Bill Wright" wrote in message news ![]() On 16/12/2017 09:10, Norman Wells wrote: On 16/12/2017 08:01, Brian Gaff wrote: Maybe the studio was too small or the wide angle lenses introduced too much distortion. Brian I would suggest setting the aspect ratio on the TV back to 16:9. You wouldn't lose the sides by setting it to 4:3. All you'd do is make the students look thin. Bill You would if you'd selected 4:3 'pan & scan' rather than 'letterbox'. -- Dave W This was on iPlayer through a computer Browser. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|